Find the right starting point.
A scoped diagnostic for one important domain, workflow or AI use case.
- Evidence-backed baseline
- Prioritised gaps and owners
- 30 / 60 / 90-day roadmap
Eight ways to make ownership, evidence and responsible data use more practical. Choose a service or start with a diagnostic to define the right scope.

Find the gaps worth fixing first.
Give every important decision an owner.
Know what you have. Know where it goes.
Make important numbers explainable.
Turn privacy requirements into working routines.
Prepare the information your AI will depend on.
Understand the data relationship before you sign.
Keep governance moving after the project.
A scoped diagnostic for one important domain, workflow or AI use case.
A defined delivery project, built around an agreed outcome and acceptance criteria.
Fractional support to maintain the programme and develop internal capability.
We start by agreeing the problem, sponsor, domain, available evidence and boundaries. A diagnostic can establish a baseline before you commit to implementation. Exact scope, team, fees and acceptance criteria are agreed in writing.
Not necessarily. The first problem may be unclear ownership, conflicting definitions or an untested handoff. We define the operating need before considering software. Tool integrations and implementation access are separately scoped.
No. It is a self-reported planning exercise. It does not inspect systems, verify answers, assess all applicable requirements or establish legal compliance. Unknown answers remain visible in the results.
No. We provide operational consulting and implementation support. Legal advice, formal assurance, certification and specialist testing require the appropriate separately engaged professionals.
No. Discovery begins with a business brief, system descriptions, metadata and redacted examples. Any later access, processing, security arrangements and retention terms must be agreed before information is transferred.
DataGovernance.ca focuses on the information foundations: ownership, definitions, quality, permissions, lineage and lifecycle. AIGovernance.ca is the connected AI-governance resource. An AI engagement may need both workstreams, with its actual scope agreed in advance.
Tell us what is not working. We will discuss a sensible starting scope.
Choose one decision, name the people involved and set an evidence boundary before anyone asks for your data.
Prepare your project briefName the report, workflow or use case that needs to work better.
Identify the owner, allowed evidence and important exclusions.
Agree what a colleague should be able to repeat or verify.
Each guide explains a use case, working evidence and appropriate service boundaries.
Data governance for finance and operations teams tired of reconciling the same numbers every month.
Explore this topic ↗A pragmatic route for teams whose critical reports, registers and approvals still travel through Excel and shared drives.
Explore this topic ↗Govern the documents behind retrieval, search and AI assistants—not merely the model or the chatbot interface.
Explore this topic ↗Defined recurring support for organisations that need ownership, decisions and oversight rather than another dormant policy.
Explore this topic ↗A bounded third-party data review for software buyers, procurement, operations and privacy stakeholders.
Explore this topic ↗Prepare a defensible data handover and integration workplan without making unsupported claims about assets or compliance.
Explore this topic ↗Make access requests, retention decisions and exception escalation operational—with legal interpretation kept in the right hands.
Explore this topic ↗